TRUST / REVIEWABLE STRUCTURE
Trust content without compliance theater.
Use the structure to explain security, availability, procurement, and customer responsibilities—then replace every example with approved evidence.
01 / SECURITY APPROACH
Show the control model before you show a badge.
01 / ACCESS
Identity + access
Describe roles, least-privilege assumptions, review cadence, and account recovery boundaries.
02 / DATA
Data handling
Map collection, retention, export, deletion, and regional storage decisions before launch.
03 / CHANGE
Change governance
Document owners, approvals, environment boundaries, and the evidence retained for releases.
04 / RESPONSE
Incident readiness
Define intake, severity, communication, containment, review, and follow-up responsibilities.
02 / CONTROL BOUNDARIES
A reviewable model, not an implied guarantee.
The layers below are a communication framework. Replace every control, owner, system, and evidence source with validated implementation detail.
DEMO ARCHITECTURE · VERIFY WITH SECURITY + LEGAL
01 / BOUNDARY
02 / APPLICATION
03 / DATA
04 / OPERATIONS
03 / DATA PRACTICES
Make the data lifecycle visible.
State what is collected, why it is needed, how long it is retained, who can export it, and how deletion requests are handled. Do not inherit this demo copy unchanged.
REQUIRES PRODUCT + LEGAL REVIEW
04 / AVAILABILITY
Separate status communication from marketing.
Use a real status source for live availability. This template links to the operational changelog as a demonstration of transparent change communication—not as an uptime claim.
NO UPTIME OR SLA CLAIM IS MADE
05 / REQUEST + REVIEW
Trust questions deserve accountable answers.
Use this section to route security questionnaires, data requests, and architecture reviews to the right owner.
Does RelayWorks hold security certifications?
Where is production data stored?
Is there a public uptime guarantee?
How should security requests be handled?
FOUNDRYOS / TRUST HANDOFF